tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10221823.post114229006977912221..comments2024-01-05T02:49:13.756-06:00Comments on Out of the Binjo Ditch: What's the Difference?Stevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15148864091827107809noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10221823.post-1142391516707754642006-03-14T20:58:00.000-06:002006-03-14T20:58:00.000-06:00To quote tvgasm.com: "Dude, not sure how to break ...To quote tvgasm.com: "Dude, not sure how to break this to you, but for the last nine years you've been on the payroll of a show that's featured NAMBLA, "cripple fights," Christopher Reeve sucking on dead fetuses to get at their stem cells, and songs about how THE VIRGIN MARY CAN GIVE BLOWJOBS AND STILL BE A VIRGIN."<BR/><BR/>But if it's in fact the Scientology episode that was the proverbial straw for Isaac, I have to say that that episode was one of the few I've watched in the past couple of years (that and the Paris Hilton sucking things up into her scary vagina episode) and I thought it was HILARIOUS. I mean, what's not to make fun of about Scientology? It's the most absurd "religion" out there! Usually I found South Park to be boring and pathetically offensive. In fact, it's so pathetic, it's not even offensive, except for offending my intelligence with the horribly low-brow, lazy humor. But the Scientology episode was quite good. It had R. Kelly singing his ridiculous lengthy closet song! And John Travolta & Tom Cruise in a closet! Together! Sure, they didn't have to try very hard to come up with those jokes, but I liked it anyway. And they didn't have to make fun of gays or minorities or the differently abled. Just Scientologists. And come on, who DOESN'T make fun of Scientologists? I mean, aliens, volcanos...COME ON!!red.hot.mamma!https://www.blogger.com/profile/16009079438690150776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10221823.post-1142369071025087712006-03-14T14:44:00.000-06:002006-03-14T14:44:00.000-06:00Uh oh. Red flag. I really enjoyed South Park up un...Uh oh. Red flag. I really enjoyed South Park up until the time when they started creating four new shows then aired reruns for the rest of each season. This seems to be a trend - which I cannot stand. <BR/><BR/>Though I don't fit into the typical audience which Cassie accurately defined, I seemed to fit into the 'can't sleep at night and there's absolutely nothing else on in that time-slot' crowd. <BR/><BR/>I don't find fault with Hayes leaving the show, and I guess if I have some oddball desire to hear Chef anymore, I'll just have to put on one of my old IH LPs. :)Weary Haghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15809105824011470783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10221823.post-1142352519437041372006-03-14T10:08:00.000-06:002006-03-14T10:08:00.000-06:00I think that shows like South Park and Beavis and ...I think that shows like South Park and Beavis and Butthead are geared more for the pothead late high school/early college age viewing groups. I think that they're disgusting and I was never interested in them even when I was the appropriate age. <BR/>Incidentally, I remember when the Simpsons was considered inappropriate for television and wasn't there a little bit of controversy over it?Cassiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12080913200722597938noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10221823.post-1142295626140154752006-03-13T18:20:00.000-06:002006-03-13T18:20:00.000-06:00He cashed the checks while he worked there; he qui...He cashed the checks while he worked there; he quit (and quit cashing checks) when he decided he could no longer so do. It seems disingenuous on their part to be tacky about it.<BR/><BR/>Did you know that Matt Groenig didn't let his son watch "The Simpson?"English Professorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15191669597257396380noreply@blogger.com