Sunday, November 27, 2005

Wal Mart and the economy

I'm not really a fan of Wal-Mart. I know they sell things on the cheap and as such allow people to afford to buy things tehy otherwise couldn't. However, I believe Wal-Mart and its ilk are bad for the economy in the long run.

And apparently, I'm not alone. Last night while I was up for 4 hours with my insomniac toddler son, we caught a program on PBS that discussed Wal-Mart's effect on the economy. While I can't remember much in detail (it was 2 in the morning), I can go over the gist of it here.

First - Wal-Mart attracts itself to municipalities by advertising new jobs and lower prices. This comes at a cost, though. According to the program, in many of the places where Wal-Mart markets itself, Wal-Mart won't open unless they have considerable help from the community. They claim they need the community to help by subsidizing the cost and providing tax breaks to the company in order for the community (who banks on the future returns) to have the store. In more than one location, once the subsidies that Wal-Mart gets (in one instance, a ten year break) ends, Wal-Mart will leave the store and move somewhere else, leaving an empty shell that nobody else can fill.

Second - New Jobs - Wal Mart advertises that it creates new jobs with many benefits for the community. What they don't mention is that in order to keep the prices as low as they do, they have to pay at or near minimum wage for the jobs they create. They do offer medical benefits, but they come at a price that most of the employees can't afford. The program noted that in one community, 68% of the people who worked retail were covered by insurance, but when Wal-Mart came in, that number dropped to somewhere around 35% (I think, but it was low). One man who worked for Wal-Mart stated that he worked full time for $1200/month, and the insurance that Wal-Mart offered cost $210/month, about 20% of his total pay. He couldn't afford that, and neither can many of the working poor, who end up eschewing insurance for free clinics, a cost that is passed on to the taxpayers in the community not to mention a drain on the medical community, taking away the customers that the doctors need to stay in business.

Third - revenues. Wal-Mart advertises that it creates much in terms of revenue for the community - one of the major selling points. However, market research shows that instead of the gain in revenues, there is an average loss of 10% in community revenues in a city where a Wal-Mart opens. This is due to a couple things. First, the money comes from the same people. Just because a new store opens doesn't mean that people will start spending more money. Combine this with the fact that Wal-Mart charges less than local businesses, and you end up with less revenue for the same amount spent.

Fourth - Impact on the community. Wal-Mart is headquartered in Arkansas. Their businesses are all over the country. The money that Wal-Mart makes goes back to Arkansas, as opposed to local businesses, especially mom and pop businesses, who keep the money in the locality. This ends up being a drain on the local economy. Since they're taking businesses away from the local stores, those stores go out of business. This results in a dearth of jobs in the community, and a drop in average income because now the workers are at Wal-Mart making minimum wage. This gives the consumer less money to spend and thus less money goes toward revenue, which hurts the community.

It's time to start looking beyond the few dollars and cents that you save by shopping at Wal-Mart and think about what's better for the economy. More money in fewer hands is good for the few who are getting the money, but bad for the nation as a whole. Spend that extra couple of dollars and make sure that people keep working.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

You have helped to explain why the NEA urges its members to boycott Wal Mart: practices that are unfair to their own work force. Unions do not allow that to happen. That doesn't mean that Wal Mart needs to go union, but if old Sam and those who inherited from him really cared about this country, wouldn't they be working for the good of the country/community, rather than the good of themselves?

I happen to be pro union. And whether a person is or isn't, most of us have reaped the benefits of unions fighting on behalf of workers.

By the way, my community successfully waged war against Wal Mart, and prevented the megacorporation from invading our little town.

On another note re Wal Mart: why do they care so much that we in WA should approve charter schools? Why do they funnel money into our state, lobbying our legislature, to create private schools that would use public funds, but not be held to the same accountability as public schools? Why does Wal Mart care so much what happens with education in a state so far away from Arkansas? Is education already "fixed" in Arkansas? Has Wal Mart done so much good for education in its home state that it now has money left over to change education everywhere else?

Maybe instead of lobbying our legislators, they could pump some of that cash flow into funding NCLB.

English Professor said...

The people I know who "just love" Wal-Mart the most are those toward the ends of the economic spectrum--those living paycheck-to-paycheck and those whose retirement pension is six figures. I don't fit either category.

Michelle said...

Fascinating post Steve. I'm really surprised in this day and age that they get away with this type of behaviour.

Bookworm said...

I've come to the point where I'm deeply suspicious of those "fair and balanced" PBS shows. It may be entirely accurate -- I didn't see it, and I don't know -- but I used to wear those same blinders, and I know how effectively they work to filter out information. I'm not saying that this link will lead you to information that's any more accurate, but it will lead you to information that has a different perspective.